Comments on: Gadget Review – Garmin Edge 305 http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/ Entrepreneurial Leadership and Management . . . and Other Stuff Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:29:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anonymous http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-107111 Anonymous Sat, 07 May 2011 09:15:00 +0000 http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-107111 along with your real need or desire for GPS data as part of your data-gathering before you jump to this unit. It’s cool . . . just not a slam-dunk. <a href="http://www.aluminyum1.com" rel="nofollow">aluminyum</a> along with your real need or desire for GPS data as part of your
data-gathering before you jump to this unit. It’s cool . . . just not a
slam-dunk.
aluminyum

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-107095 Anonymous Thu, 05 May 2011 06:45:00 +0000 http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-107095 Unlike previous Garmin cycling computers, though, it adds many other functions in addition to its GPS capabilities. <a href="http://www.mantolama24.com" rel="nofollow">mantolama izolasyon</a> Unlike previous Garmin cycling computers, though, it adds many other functions in addition to its GPS capabilities.
mantolama izolasyon

]]> By: Car DVD Players http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-106866 Car DVD Players Sun, 10 Oct 2010 09:09:00 +0000 http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-106866 The Garmin Edge 305 is first, a GPS device. The Garmin Edge 305 is first, a GPS device.

]]> By: Dave Jilk http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-99 Dave Jilk Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:47:29 +0000 http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-99 Interesting that your previous GPS had problems with altitude - I use a Garmin 100 (actually, a gift from you...) and use it *primarily* for altitude and find it fairly accurate - usually within 20 feet (I check it on summits).  Of course, it has to sync with four satellites to do that, so it works best above treeline.  Brad has a 300-series and it seems to do a good job with the absolute altitude even at low elevations, but the "net elevation gain" calculation is overstated - it must be counting the GPS fluctuations as real up and down. <BR><BR>By my figuring they should have both atmospheric and GPS altitude - this way the atmospheric altimeter could get synchronized with air pressure conditions whenever the GPS gets a strong reading, but you have the continuity of the atmospheric reading most times. Interesting that your previous GPS had problems with altitude – I use a Garmin 100 (actually, a gift from you…) and use it *primarily* for altitude and find it fairly accurate – usually within 20 feet (I check it on summits).  Of course, it has to sync with four satellites to do that, so it works best above treeline.  Brad has a 300-series and it seems to do a good job with the absolute altitude even at low elevations, but the “net elevation gain” calculation is overstated – it must be counting the GPS fluctuations as real up and down.

By my figuring they should have both atmospheric and GPS altitude – this way the atmospheric altimeter could get synchronized with air pressure conditions whenever the GPS gets a strong reading, but you have the continuity of the atmospheric reading most times.

]]> By: Dave Jilk http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-106058 Dave Jilk Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:47:00 +0000 http://www.2-speed.com/2006/09/gadget-review-garmin-edge-305/#comment-106058 Interesting that your previous GPS had problems with altitude - I use a Garmin 100 (actually, a gift from you...) and use it *primarily* for altitude and find it fairly accurate - usually within 20 feet (I check it on summits).  Of course, it has to sync with four satellites to do that, so it works best above treeline.  Brad has a 300-series and it seems to do a good job with the absolute altitude even at low elevations, but the "net elevation gain" calculation is overstated - it must be counting the GPS fluctuations as real up and down. By my figuring they should have both atmospheric and GPS altitude - this way the atmospheric altimeter could get synchronized with air pressure conditions whenever the GPS gets a strong reading, but you have the continuity of the atmospheric reading most times. Interesting that your previous GPS had problems with altitude – I use a Garmin 100 (actually, a gift from you…) and use it *primarily* for altitude and find it fairly accurate – usually within 20 feet (I check it on summits).  Of course, it has to sync with four satellites to do that, so it works best above treeline.  Brad has a 300-series and it seems to do a good job with the absolute altitude even at low elevations, but the “net elevation gain” calculation is overstated – it must be counting the GPS fluctuations as real up and down. By my figuring they should have both atmospheric and GPS altitude – this way the atmospheric altimeter could get synchronized with air pressure conditions whenever the GPS gets a strong reading, but you have the continuity of the atmospheric reading most times.

]]>