<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cannibalize Yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurial Leadership and Management . . . and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-9025</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-9025</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joe Matthew&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;re exorbitantly delighted that you have visited our webpage dealing with how i play golf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joe Matthew</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;re exorbitantly delighted that you have visited our webpage dealing with how i play golf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  Simplified for sure, but as you say, the point still remains.  Fix the confusion and keep moving forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Simplified for sure, but as you say, the point still remains.  Fix the confusion and keep moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-106277</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-106277</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  Simplified for sure, but as you say, the point still remains.  Fix the confusion and keep moving forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Simplified for sure, but as you say, the point still remains.  Fix the confusion and keep moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>It seems like the question of whether to retain an older product, even when the new one is not 100% overlapping, is not as simple as just retaining all the customers.  There are issues of product confusion and message dilution as well.  This doesn&#039;t really affect your main point, that they shouldn&#039;t delay bringing on the NEW product in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the question of whether to retain an older product, even when the new one is not 100% overlapping, is not as simple as just retaining all the customers.  There are issues of product confusion and message dilution as well.  This doesn&#8217;t really affect your main point, that they shouldn&#8217;t delay bringing on the NEW product in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-106276</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2007/05/cannibalize-yourself/#comment-106276</guid>
		<description>It seems like the question of whether to retain an older product, even when the new one is not 100% overlapping, is not as simple as just retaining all the customers.  There are issues of product confusion and message dilution as well.  This doesn&#039;t really affect your main point, that they shouldn&#039;t delay bringing on the NEW product in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the question of whether to retain an older product, even when the new one is not 100% overlapping, is not as simple as just retaining all the customers.  There are issues of product confusion and message dilution as well.  This doesn&#8217;t really affect your main point, that they shouldn&#8217;t delay bringing on the NEW product in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

