<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Likin&#8217; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurial Leadership and Management . . . and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acneboy</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-103277</link>
		<dc:creator>Acneboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-103277</guid>
		<description>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kymm</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-102746</link>
		<dc:creator>Kymm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-102746</guid>
		<description>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.           Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.           Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106687</guid>
		<description>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acneboy</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-85095</link>
		<dc:creator>Acneboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-85095</guid>
		<description>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106686</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106686</guid>
		<description>i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melatoninlady</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106685</link>
		<dc:creator>melatoninlady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106685</guid>
		<description>Microsoft Bing would be the closet competitor of Google. but i still use Google because it shows more relevant results on the serp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Bing would be the closet competitor of Google. but i still use Google because it shows more relevant results on the serp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adirec Torytski</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-77475</link>
		<dc:creator>Adirec Torytski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-77475</guid>
		<description>The statements regarding the images is right on the nail.  Doesn&#039;t seem to be a suitable explanation - Yet! but they definitely do current return a better list of images at Bing than Google for the same search.  Also that option to click on show similar imagines comes in very handy.  I also have a variety of options but previously also went straight to Google and will now perhaps give Bing a bit more of a chance just based on the other points you have raised.

No doubt there will be more upgrades and improvements as well, as long as they remain on top of it and keep doing what they are only better than some others...

Thanks
Adirec</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statements regarding the images is right on the nail.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to be a suitable explanation &#8211; Yet! but they definitely do current return a better list of images at Bing than Google for the same search.  Also that option to click on show similar imagines comes in very handy.  I also have a variety of options but previously also went straight to Google and will now perhaps give Bing a bit more of a chance just based on the other points you have raised.</p>
<p>No doubt there will be more upgrades and improvements as well, as long as they remain on top of it and keep doing what they are only better than some others&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Adirec</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adirec Torytski</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106684</link>
		<dc:creator>Adirec Torytski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106684</guid>
		<description>The statements regarding the images is right on the nail.  Doesn&#039;t seem to be a suitable explanation - Yet! but they definitely do current return a better list of images at Bing than Google for the same search.  Also that option to click on show similar imagines comes in very handy.  I also have a variety of options but previously also went straight to Google and will now perhaps give Bing a bit more of a chance just based on the other points you have raised.

No doubt there will be more upgrades and improvements as well, as long as they remain on top of it and keep doing what they are only better than some others...

Thanks
Adirec</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statements regarding the images is right on the nail.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to be a suitable explanation &#8211; Yet! but they definitely do current return a better list of images at Bing than Google for the same search.  Also that option to click on show similar imagines comes in very handy.  I also have a variety of options but previously also went straight to Google and will now perhaps give Bing a bit more of a chance just based on the other points you have raised.</p>
<p>No doubt there will be more upgrades and improvements as well, as long as they remain on top of it and keep doing what they are only better than some others&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Adirec</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popular Searches</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-77217</link>
		<dc:creator>Popular Searches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-77217</guid>
		<description>I too like Bing. I have been a Yahoo guy for as long as I can remember. I liked the one click for just about anything....Google though was my real preference when I really wanted to search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too like Bing. I have been a Yahoo guy for as long as I can remember. I liked the one click for just about anything&#8230;.Google though was my real preference when I really wanted to search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popular Searches</title>
		<link>http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106683</link>
		<dc:creator>Popular Searches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2-speed.com/2009/07/im-likin-bing/#comment-106683</guid>
		<description>I too like Bing. I have been a Yahoo guy for as long as I can remember. I liked the one click for just about anything....Google though was my real preference when I really wanted to search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too like Bing. I have been a Yahoo guy for as long as I can remember. I liked the one click for just about anything&#8230;.Google though was my real preference when I really wanted to search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

